So, maybe this makes me a "fringe issue" voter, Peter, but I do not see the point of having a Republican/conservative in office who will not fight for the reality that men cannot *be* women, that Title IX should not be rewritten/interpreted to replace "sex" with the make pretend "gender identity", and who has no concern for Gender Ideol…
So, maybe this makes me a "fringe issue" voter, Peter, but I do not see the point of having a Republican/conservative in office who will not fight for the reality that men cannot *be* women, that Title IX should not be rewritten/interpreted to replace "sex" with the make pretend "gender identity", and who has no concern for Gender Ideology being promoted in K-12 schools and girls as young as 12-16 having their breasts chopped off in "gender affirmation". You lost me when you said that Gibbs was an "extremist" for observing that the Democrats are the party of "Gender Bending". Yeahhhh.... Is your head buried in the sand? I was really offended by that. Is it far right to say that there are two sexes and that if a tiny few men have a disorder of the mind we do not need to re-order all of society - especially when it is not those guys but the fetishists who wish to alter society and "trans" children in order to give themselves cover? You could have walked a line without going there. Better to have a Democrat in place if Gibbs loses later and know where we stand. - LM
So, maybe this makes me a "fringe issue" voter, Peter, but I do not see the point of having a Republican/conservative in office who will not fight for the reality that men cannot *be* women, that Title IX should not be rewritten/interpreted to replace "sex" with the make pretend "gender identity", and who has no concern for Gender Ideology being promoted in K-12 schools and girls as young as 12-16 having their breasts chopped off in "gender affirmation". You lost me when you said that Gibbs was an "extremist" for observing that the Democrats are the party of "Gender Bending". Yeahhhh.... Is your head buried in the sand? I was really offended by that. Is it far right to say that there are two sexes and that if a tiny few men have a disorder of the mind we do not need to re-order all of society - especially when it is not those guys but the fetishists who wish to alter society and "trans" children in order to give themselves cover? You could have walked a line without going there. Better to have a Democrat in place if Gibbs loses later and know where we stand. - LM