Martin Gurri’s “bracing essay” may be the most fatuous drivel I have ever seen on this website. Mr. Gurri, you obviously have the political acumen of the average high school Sophomore, so let me help you out.
When one party weaponizes the legal machinery of the law, both federal and state, to bankrupt and imprison their primary political …
Martin Gurri’s “bracing essay” may be the most fatuous drivel I have ever seen on this website. Mr. Gurri, you obviously have the political acumen of the average high school Sophomore, so let me help you out.
When one party weaponizes the legal machinery of the law, both federal and state, to bankrupt and imprison their primary political opponent {Key Study Point>>>} that is BAD. When the same party openly decares their intention to end the filibuster, pack the Supreme Court and end any opposition to whatever laws they pass {Key study point>>>>} that is BAD. Why? Because the goal of such actions is to create a one-party state like we currently have in Venezuela and will soon have in Mexico. That, as you may possibly realize, is also BAD!.
Instead of showing any awareness of the seriousness of this situation you rattle on inanely about people who have “have turned away from the sources of meaning in the private sphere—faith, community, and neighborhood—and gone searching for their substitute in politics.” Clueless doesn’t begin to adequately describe this childish blather.
Mr. Gurri, henceforth please eschew writing about politics. Perhaps you can give us “bracing essays” us on pop psychology or gender studies since anything written on such subjects can never be shown to be either right or wrong.
Martin Gurri’s “bracing essay” may be the most fatuous drivel I have ever seen on this website. Mr. Gurri, you obviously have the political acumen of the average high school Sophomore, so let me help you out.
When one party weaponizes the legal machinery of the law, both federal and state, to bankrupt and imprison their primary political opponent {Key Study Point>>>} that is BAD. When the same party openly decares their intention to end the filibuster, pack the Supreme Court and end any opposition to whatever laws they pass {Key study point>>>>} that is BAD. Why? Because the goal of such actions is to create a one-party state like we currently have in Venezuela and will soon have in Mexico. That, as you may possibly realize, is also BAD!.
Instead of showing any awareness of the seriousness of this situation you rattle on inanely about people who have “have turned away from the sources of meaning in the private sphere—faith, community, and neighborhood—and gone searching for their substitute in politics.” Clueless doesn’t begin to adequately describe this childish blather.
Mr. Gurri, henceforth please eschew writing about politics. Perhaps you can give us “bracing essays” us on pop psychology or gender studies since anything written on such subjects can never be shown to be either right or wrong.