Zero evidence of harm? Over 1 million adverse reactions in VAERS with over 22K deaths - the vast majority of which have occurred in the first 3 days with nearly half day 1? 6 peer reviewed studies showing that 1 in 2,000 to 1 in 3,000 adolescent males will develop myocarditis if “up to date in their shots” - exponentially higher than the…
Zero evidence of harm? Over 1 million adverse reactions in VAERS with over 22K deaths - the vast majority of which have occurred in the first 3 days with nearly half day 1? 6 peer reviewed studies showing that 1 in 2,000 to 1 in 3,000 adolescent males will develop myocarditis if “up to date in their shots” - exponentially higher than the rate from natural infection (something the shots don’t prevent anyway).
Bari - if you are going to make claims, try backing them up with actual evidence. That’s what those making the assertion of harm are doing - posting the evidence with references to sources (most often government reported raw data from around the world).
You’re inability to EVER admit you were wrong, even on things you were probably wrong about, is crushing your credibility.
Zero evidence of harm? Over 1 million adverse reactions in VAERS with over 22K deaths - the vast majority of which have occurred in the first 3 days with nearly half day 1? 6 peer reviewed studies showing that 1 in 2,000 to 1 in 3,000 adolescent males will develop myocarditis if “up to date in their shots” - exponentially higher than the rate from natural infection (something the shots don’t prevent anyway).
Bari - if you are going to make claims, try backing them up with actual evidence. That’s what those making the assertion of harm are doing - posting the evidence with references to sources (most often government reported raw data from around the world).
You’re inability to EVER admit you were wrong, even on things you were probably wrong about, is crushing your credibility.