"Obviously, schools do not choose between teaching reading and gender ideology"
This line is a great example of the bias in this piece. First, it's an assumption stated as fact without any evidence. Second it can't be true given that time is limited and new time spent on gender ideology to any extent is time not spent on subjects previous…
"Obviously, schools do not choose between teaching reading and gender ideology"
This line is a great example of the bias in this piece. First, it's an assumption stated as fact without any evidence. Second it can't be true given that time is limited and new time spent on gender ideology to any extent is time not spent on subjects previously covered. We obviously know these things are being introduced bc we have ample evidence of it from all over the country. Third, the rapidly falling proficiency scores in math for example across the country would seem to indicate that this trade off is indeed happening.
This is just one obvious example of bias but the author also cherry picks some bad apples or specific examples to try and paint the entire movement in a bad light while not at all taking seriously the core issues this movement is addressing.
I'm very close to cancelling my subscription to TFP. it's starting to feel like this was created to take advantage of the public's desire for independent journalism but is really just the same liberal BS dressed up as objective journalism. The people don't want your bias. We want objective reporting.
"Obviously, schools do not choose between teaching reading and gender ideology"
This line is a great example of the bias in this piece. First, it's an assumption stated as fact without any evidence. Second it can't be true given that time is limited and new time spent on gender ideology to any extent is time not spent on subjects previously covered. We obviously know these things are being introduced bc we have ample evidence of it from all over the country. Third, the rapidly falling proficiency scores in math for example across the country would seem to indicate that this trade off is indeed happening.
This is just one obvious example of bias but the author also cherry picks some bad apples or specific examples to try and paint the entire movement in a bad light while not at all taking seriously the core issues this movement is addressing.
I'm very close to cancelling my subscription to TFP. it's starting to feel like this was created to take advantage of the public's desire for independent journalism but is really just the same liberal BS dressed up as objective journalism. The people don't want your bias. We want objective reporting.