This both sides-ism has got to stop. One side calls Trump and existential threat, the other puts their middle finger in the air.
Even the citation of Trumps use of the term "bloodbath" is disingenuous at best. The context of him using that term--was in what was going to happen to the car industry. It had nothing to do with Joe being a thr…
This both sides-ism has got to stop. One side calls Trump and existential threat, the other puts their middle finger in the air.
Even the citation of Trumps use of the term "bloodbath" is disingenuous at best. The context of him using that term--was in what was going to happen to the car industry. It had nothing to do with Joe being a threat to the world nor remotely an incitement to violence.
Can you not see that?
8 years of relentless Pavlovian mind training to upchuck "orange man is a threat" and this article implying that "FJB" is equal incitement to violence is verging on a case study in cognitive dissonance at this point.
This both sides-ism has got to stop. One side calls Trump and existential threat, the other puts their middle finger in the air.
Even the citation of Trumps use of the term "bloodbath" is disingenuous at best. The context of him using that term--was in what was going to happen to the car industry. It had nothing to do with Joe being a threat to the world nor remotely an incitement to violence.
Can you not see that?
8 years of relentless Pavlovian mind training to upchuck "orange man is a threat" and this article implying that "FJB" is equal incitement to violence is verging on a case study in cognitive dissonance at this point.