Ok, so are we now taking the word of Hamas? This is a group that said Iran has been involved in the attacks. The WSJ did a piece on it. This was lightly sourced and one that had to rely on information from a Terrorist org. This is reliable? Again, Is it honest journalism to repeat this information without verification?
Ok, so are we now taking the word of Hamas? This is a group that said Iran has been involved in the attacks. The WSJ did a piece on it. This was lightly sourced and one that had to rely on information from a Terrorist org. This is reliable? Again, Is it honest journalism to repeat this information without verification?
Ok, so are we now taking the word of Hamas? This is a group that said Iran has been involved in the attacks. The WSJ did a piece on it. This was lightly sourced and one that had to rely on information from a Terrorist org. This is reliable? Again, Is it honest journalism to repeat this information without verification?
It's hard to know what is real and what isn't these days. It's a confusing problem, to be sure.