Thanks. Know I'm not trying to be insensitive here. I just think it's irresponsible on the part of journalists to say stuff like "40 babies have been beheaded" or "this woman or that woman in this or that video were raped". How can you possible verify that? Plus, a lot of things like that have been walked back? How does this make the Fre…
Thanks. Know I'm not trying to be insensitive here. I just think it's irresponsible on the part of journalists to say stuff like "40 babies have been beheaded" or "this woman or that woman in this or that video were raped". How can you possible verify that? Plus, a lot of things like that have been walked back? How does this make the Free Press different, if they're jumping to conclusions and repeating things the mainstream says?
I agree with your concerns. I will say there's a LOT of eye witness testimony of the murders and rapes. Hamas doesn't do it in secret, and have been live streaming and/or sending video to the loved ones of the victims.
I'd rather not see that footage to spare me the nightmares, but there are alternative news outlets that believe in showing the gorey atrocities of the attacks for the sake of showing people the truth. So it's out there if you feel the need to see it to understand what happened. TGIF is just not the place to find those images.
Ok, so are we now taking the word of Hamas? This is a group that said Iran has been involved in the attacks. The WSJ did a piece on it. This was lightly sourced and one that had to rely on information from a Terrorist org. This is reliable? Again, Is it honest journalism to repeat this information without verification?
Thanks. Know I'm not trying to be insensitive here. I just think it's irresponsible on the part of journalists to say stuff like "40 babies have been beheaded" or "this woman or that woman in this or that video were raped". How can you possible verify that? Plus, a lot of things like that have been walked back? How does this make the Free Press different, if they're jumping to conclusions and repeating things the mainstream says?
I agree with your concerns. I will say there's a LOT of eye witness testimony of the murders and rapes. Hamas doesn't do it in secret, and have been live streaming and/or sending video to the loved ones of the victims.
I'd rather not see that footage to spare me the nightmares, but there are alternative news outlets that believe in showing the gorey atrocities of the attacks for the sake of showing people the truth. So it's out there if you feel the need to see it to understand what happened. TGIF is just not the place to find those images.
Ok, so are we now taking the word of Hamas? This is a group that said Iran has been involved in the attacks. The WSJ did a piece on it. This was lightly sourced and one that had to rely on information from a Terrorist org. This is reliable? Again, Is it honest journalism to repeat this information without verification?
It's hard to know what is real and what isn't these days. It's a confusing problem, to be sure.