In the light of honest reporting, can you absolutely confirm that women have been raped? This isn't something anyone should take lightly, especially throwing around that charge. For example, the women that was handcuffed in the back of a jeep, hands behind her back and and from the looks of it, the outside of her pants on her backsi…
In the light of honest reporting, can you absolutely confirm that women have been raped? This isn't something anyone should take lightly, especially throwing around that charge. For example, the women that was handcuffed in the back of a jeep, hands behind her back and and from the looks of it, the outside of her pants on her backside were bloody. If she was raped, there is no excuse. It's a terrible a reached act. If she wasn't, don't you think it's possible that the handcuffs cause her writs to bleed, making her backside bloody? All I'm saying is HOW DO WE KNOW FOR SURE? AND...does it do any good to keep repeating that she was raped, if it's not verified? Isn't it more optimistic and less presumptuous and inflammatory to think/say that the ruff handling of her while she's handcuffed caused her butt to be bloody. That's what was obvious to me. It wasn't obvious that she hd been raped. But, I could be totally wrong on this. Additionally, Theres so much bullshit information floating around right now it's ridiculous. Even the free press has been repeating what everyone has been repeating. How can we trust the free press on this coverage?
Thanks. Know I'm not trying to be insensitive here. I just think it's irresponsible on the part of journalists to say stuff like "40 babies have been beheaded" or "this woman or that woman in this or that video were raped". How can you possible verify that? Plus, a lot of things like that have been walked back? How does this make the Free Press different, if they're jumping to conclusions and repeating things the mainstream says?
I agree with your concerns. I will say there's a LOT of eye witness testimony of the murders and rapes. Hamas doesn't do it in secret, and have been live streaming and/or sending video to the loved ones of the victims.
I'd rather not see that footage to spare me the nightmares, but there are alternative news outlets that believe in showing the gorey atrocities of the attacks for the sake of showing people the truth. So it's out there if you feel the need to see it to understand what happened. TGIF is just not the place to find those images.
Ok, so are we now taking the word of Hamas? This is a group that said Iran has been involved in the attacks. The WSJ did a piece on it. This was lightly sourced and one that had to rely on information from a Terrorist org. This is reliable? Again, Is it honest journalism to repeat this information without verification?
Bari,
In the light of honest reporting, can you absolutely confirm that women have been raped? This isn't something anyone should take lightly, especially throwing around that charge. For example, the women that was handcuffed in the back of a jeep, hands behind her back and and from the looks of it, the outside of her pants on her backside were bloody. If she was raped, there is no excuse. It's a terrible a reached act. If she wasn't, don't you think it's possible that the handcuffs cause her writs to bleed, making her backside bloody? All I'm saying is HOW DO WE KNOW FOR SURE? AND...does it do any good to keep repeating that she was raped, if it's not verified? Isn't it more optimistic and less presumptuous and inflammatory to think/say that the ruff handling of her while she's handcuffed caused her butt to be bloody. That's what was obvious to me. It wasn't obvious that she hd been raped. But, I could be totally wrong on this. Additionally, Theres so much bullshit information floating around right now it's ridiculous. Even the free press has been repeating what everyone has been repeating. How can we trust the free press on this coverage?
This is a 15 second clip of a member of Hamas admitting that they kidnap women to defile them by way of rape. https://rumble.com/v3omurj-disturbing-video-of-hamas-terrorist-reveals-why-they-kidnapped-women.html
Thanks. Know I'm not trying to be insensitive here. I just think it's irresponsible on the part of journalists to say stuff like "40 babies have been beheaded" or "this woman or that woman in this or that video were raped". How can you possible verify that? Plus, a lot of things like that have been walked back? How does this make the Free Press different, if they're jumping to conclusions and repeating things the mainstream says?
I agree with your concerns. I will say there's a LOT of eye witness testimony of the murders and rapes. Hamas doesn't do it in secret, and have been live streaming and/or sending video to the loved ones of the victims.
I'd rather not see that footage to spare me the nightmares, but there are alternative news outlets that believe in showing the gorey atrocities of the attacks for the sake of showing people the truth. So it's out there if you feel the need to see it to understand what happened. TGIF is just not the place to find those images.
Ok, so are we now taking the word of Hamas? This is a group that said Iran has been involved in the attacks. The WSJ did a piece on it. This was lightly sourced and one that had to rely on information from a Terrorist org. This is reliable? Again, Is it honest journalism to repeat this information without verification?
It's hard to know what is real and what isn't these days. It's a confusing problem, to be sure.