If there is no proof that vaccines cause autism then why is RFK always giving supporting data? If you are serious then you will reference his CDC results and point by point show where he is wrong. And if ivermectin and hydroxichlorquin are of no use then you can say no harm no foul but you absolutely cannot say that it was legitimate to …
If there is no proof that vaccines cause autism then why is RFK always giving supporting data? If you are serious then you will reference his CDC results and point by point show where he is wrong. And if ivermectin and hydroxichlorquin are of no use then you can say no harm no foul but you absolutely cannot say that it was legitimate to only offer intubation and remdesovir as the “gold standard” treatment for Covid 19. That protocol killed more people than Covid did.
If there is no proof that vaccines cause autism then why is RFK always giving supporting data? If you are serious then you will reference his CDC results and point by point show where he is wrong. And if ivermectin and hydroxichlorquin are of no use then you can say no harm no foul but you absolutely cannot say that it was legitimate to only offer intubation and remdesovir as the “gold standard” treatment for Covid 19. That protocol killed more people than Covid did.