I appreciated the debate even though I disagree with the “final score”, which depended on a crowd of Washington DC elites (I presume). The “NO” side presented arguments that are far more representative of the majority of the country, imho. I think that with an objective audience as scorekeepers they would win.
I appreciated the debate even though I disagree with the “final score”, which depended on a crowd of Washington DC elites (I presume). The “NO” side presented arguments that are far more representative of the majority of the country, imho. I think that with an objective audience as scorekeepers they would win.
And while financial well being isn’t the whole game, it enables most of the rest of it. I don’t see my children and grandchildren doing as well as me and they’re having fewer options with their lives. Their generations’ stress and well being show it.
I appreciated the debate even though I disagree with the “final score”, which depended on a crowd of Washington DC elites (I presume). The “NO” side presented arguments that are far more representative of the majority of the country, imho. I think that with an objective audience as scorekeepers they would win.
And while financial well being isn’t the whole game, it enables most of the rest of it. I don’t see my children and grandchildren doing as well as me and they’re having fewer options with their lives. Their generations’ stress and well being show it.