Yeah, except they are.
provide your 'sources'
and circular sourcing is not legitimate: Just because NYT cites WP which sites reuters, which cites hamas is not a legitimate source. Which is how much of this misinformation is being laundered to become 'news'.
Yeah, except they are.
provide your 'sources'
and circular sourcing is not legitimate: Just because NYT cites WP which sites reuters, which cites hamas is not a legitimate source. Which is how much of this misinformation is being laundered to become 'news'.