I'm going to ignore your offense of my "attack" on your religion and chalk it up as blind faith. I could direct you to read books like "Apocalypse Never" by Michael Shellenberger, But I won't waste my time. It's like telling a Christian that God doesn't exist. All of the studies you are referencing were funded by someone with an interest…
I'm going to ignore your offense of my "attack" on your religion and chalk it up as blind faith. I could direct you to read books like "Apocalypse Never" by Michael Shellenberger, But I won't waste my time. It's like telling a Christian that God doesn't exist. All of the studies you are referencing were funded by someone with an interest in the "data", that's a fact. You go on believing what you will and virtue signalling as you please, I know what the actual science says and that's what matters to me. The difference is, like Shellenberger, I have lived on both sides of the debate, my change of mind came from combining data that came without an agenda with a desire to be a better thinker, you can go on enjoying your wilful ignorance, it is of no consequence to me.
I'm going to ignore your offense of my "attack" on your religion and chalk it up as blind faith. I could direct you to read books like "Apocalypse Never" by Michael Shellenberger, But I won't waste my time. It's like telling a Christian that God doesn't exist. All of the studies you are referencing were funded by someone with an interest in the "data", that's a fact. You go on believing what you will and virtue signalling as you please, I know what the actual science says and that's what matters to me. The difference is, like Shellenberger, I have lived on both sides of the debate, my change of mind came from combining data that came without an agenda with a desire to be a better thinker, you can go on enjoying your wilful ignorance, it is of no consequence to me.