There was "plenty of scientific evidence" proving that tobacco was harmless and denying the prevailing scientific view expressed in the Surgeon General's admonitions until the deadly impacts of smoking and chewing tobacco took so many lives that the contrarian's "evidence" was shown to be completely bogus. The sugar industry paid a scie…
There was "plenty of scientific evidence" proving that tobacco was harmless and denying the prevailing scientific view expressed in the Surgeon General's admonitions until the deadly impacts of smoking and chewing tobacco took so many lives that the contrarian's "evidence" was shown to be completely bogus. The sugar industry paid a scientist at Harvard University to publish "research" that refuted the deleterious impact of sugar consumption on human health. His mendacious claims and his scientific reputation have been, thankfully, dismissed by real science.
Yes, there are legitimate scientists, very few of them climate scientists, who deny the reality of anthropogenic climate change. It appears to me that you and the climate change deniers are the ones who sought out views that affirmed what you wanted to believe and denied the overwhelming evidence to the contrary. Suggest you read a book by the distinguished historian of science at Harvard, Naomi Oreskes: "Merchants of Doubt.: Oreskes documents how industry-supported "scientists" sow doubt and confusion about tobacco, climate change, sugar, and more recently, Covid-19.
There was "plenty of scientific evidence" proving that tobacco was harmless and denying the prevailing scientific view expressed in the Surgeon General's admonitions until the deadly impacts of smoking and chewing tobacco took so many lives that the contrarian's "evidence" was shown to be completely bogus. The sugar industry paid a scientist at Harvard University to publish "research" that refuted the deleterious impact of sugar consumption on human health. His mendacious claims and his scientific reputation have been, thankfully, dismissed by real science.
Yes, there are legitimate scientists, very few of them climate scientists, who deny the reality of anthropogenic climate change. It appears to me that you and the climate change deniers are the ones who sought out views that affirmed what you wanted to believe and denied the overwhelming evidence to the contrary. Suggest you read a book by the distinguished historian of science at Harvard, Naomi Oreskes: "Merchants of Doubt.: Oreskes documents how industry-supported "scientists" sow doubt and confusion about tobacco, climate change, sugar, and more recently, Covid-19.