First, Tucker is not a proponent of the war in Ukraine. As a libertarian, I believe he does not like in general, foreign involvement unless it clearly is to our interest as in a real time threat. And while it’s two different issues, there’s clearly an underlying frustration in contributing billions to Ukraine’s border integrity, and igno…
First, Tucker is not a proponent of the war in Ukraine. As a libertarian, I believe he does not like in general, foreign involvement unless it clearly is to our interest as in a real time threat. And while it’s two different issues, there’s clearly an underlying frustration in contributing billions to Ukraine’s border integrity, and ignoring ours. That said I believe he was trying to demonstrate the sanctions are having very little effect on Russia and that the overall political leadership in Ukraine is still corrupt. An interview with Putin by any measure is a journalistic coup and I’m sure there were some restrictions on his questions. I don’t agree with everything Tucker Carlson says, but he certainly provides an alternative to the political and lapdog media.
First, Tucker is not a proponent of the war in Ukraine. As a libertarian, I believe he does not like in general, foreign involvement unless it clearly is to our interest as in a real time threat. And while it’s two different issues, there’s clearly an underlying frustration in contributing billions to Ukraine’s border integrity, and ignoring ours. That said I believe he was trying to demonstrate the sanctions are having very little effect on Russia and that the overall political leadership in Ukraine is still corrupt. An interview with Putin by any measure is a journalistic coup and I’m sure there were some restrictions on his questions. I don’t agree with everything Tucker Carlson says, but he certainly provides an alternative to the political and lapdog media.