Just read a Washington Post article that didn't even mention any of the specifics of Saturday's attacks until paragraph six (and then only got as specific as saying that "The attack on Saturday saw Palestinian gunmen infiltrate Israel at multiple points" - a fairly sanitized description.) But somehow the Post saw fit to inform us in para…
Just read a Washington Post article that didn't even mention any of the specifics of Saturday's attacks until paragraph six (and then only got as specific as saying that "The attack on Saturday saw Palestinian gunmen infiltrate Israel at multiple points" - a fairly sanitized description.) But somehow the Post saw fit to inform us in paragraph one that "A swelling counterattack by Israeli forces in Gaza killed more than 400 people, including 78 children." What was that you were saying Bari?
On a more positive note, the Wall Street Journal's coverage has been quite good, unflinchingly reporting the truth from Israel, Gaza, and Iran. WSJ is now, imo, NYC's newspaper of record.
Just read a Washington Post article that didn't even mention any of the specifics of Saturday's attacks until paragraph six (and then only got as specific as saying that "The attack on Saturday saw Palestinian gunmen infiltrate Israel at multiple points" - a fairly sanitized description.) But somehow the Post saw fit to inform us in paragraph one that "A swelling counterattack by Israeli forces in Gaza killed more than 400 people, including 78 children." What was that you were saying Bari?
On a more positive note, the Wall Street Journal's coverage has been quite good, unflinchingly reporting the truth from Israel, Gaza, and Iran. WSJ is now, imo, NYC's newspaper of record.