Oh, and the election denialism supposedly by Clinton and the Dems from 2016 is not even in the same ballpark as what took place in 2020, and disseminated by Trump himself. Unlike the reasonable concerns and criticisms of the Russian interference in 2016 that was based on facts, Trump and his supporters harvested fields of bullshit about …
Oh, and the election denialism supposedly by Clinton and the Dems from 2016 is not even in the same ballpark as what took place in 2020, and disseminated by Trump himself. Unlike the reasonable concerns and criticisms of the Russian interference in 2016 that was based on facts, Trump and his supporters harvested fields of bullshit about his 2020 loss, and every time each wild lie and conspiracy was disproven, just moved the goalposts to another lie and conspiracy with barely a blink. Miss me with this false equivalence bulllshit that pretends that wondering whether fake social media anti-Clinton "reports" paid for by Russians might have swayed some voters into not voting is the same thing as claiming a vast nationwide conspiracy of hundreds of local elections offices were complicit in creating and counting "fake ballots", of foreign hacking "algorithms" to change real vote outcomes, etc. Let alone in conceding the race and conducting a proper turnover. Guess who did and guess who didn’t.
But really - this is disappointing for TFP. Presenting anecdotal accounts of people who weren't voting for Biden to begin with, people who were already quiet Trump voters, in service of trying to sell a desired narrative (of which it is way too early to even tell what the effect is of his conviction) of voters siding with Trump on the issue of his legal problems. Even the first paragraph states the earliest polling states the opposite, yet the authors trotted out these lame "proofs" anyway. News at 11! Trump supporters still support Trump lol. Awesome reporting ;P
* and let’s be frank, two likely very “challenged” in the button sized arena of these two little fat dudes that would be absolutely comedy gold in any other context that did not involve actual nuclear power capabilities, and really it was Kim Jong Un who really “won” the Tweet battle by gifting us all with the moniker of “Dotard” for The Donald, a most fitting insult actually, and despite what Trump supporters think, displayed a much keener sense of insult than Trump himself has ever demonstrated with his lame and repetitive (and diminishing!) limited vocabulary stable of insults he rotates through!
Oh, and the election denialism supposedly by Clinton and the Dems from 2016 is not even in the same ballpark as what took place in 2020, and disseminated by Trump himself. Unlike the reasonable concerns and criticisms of the Russian interference in 2016 that was based on facts, Trump and his supporters harvested fields of bullshit about his 2020 loss, and every time each wild lie and conspiracy was disproven, just moved the goalposts to another lie and conspiracy with barely a blink. Miss me with this false equivalence bulllshit that pretends that wondering whether fake social media anti-Clinton "reports" paid for by Russians might have swayed some voters into not voting is the same thing as claiming a vast nationwide conspiracy of hundreds of local elections offices were complicit in creating and counting "fake ballots", of foreign hacking "algorithms" to change real vote outcomes, etc. Let alone in conceding the race and conducting a proper turnover. Guess who did and guess who didn’t.
But really - this is disappointing for TFP. Presenting anecdotal accounts of people who weren't voting for Biden to begin with, people who were already quiet Trump voters, in service of trying to sell a desired narrative (of which it is way too early to even tell what the effect is of his conviction) of voters siding with Trump on the issue of his legal problems. Even the first paragraph states the earliest polling states the opposite, yet the authors trotted out these lame "proofs" anyway. News at 11! Trump supporters still support Trump lol. Awesome reporting ;P
* and let’s be frank, two likely very “challenged” in the button sized arena of these two little fat dudes that would be absolutely comedy gold in any other context that did not involve actual nuclear power capabilities, and really it was Kim Jong Un who really “won” the Tweet battle by gifting us all with the moniker of “Dotard” for The Donald, a most fitting insult actually, and despite what Trump supporters think, displayed a much keener sense of insult than Trump himself has ever demonstrated with his lame and repetitive (and diminishing!) limited vocabulary stable of insults he rotates through!
Okay, now you're descending into humor. Is this a parody account?