⭠ Return to thread

The story line convincingly addresses the line between good and evil. It also reveals those who instinctively are able to choose and those who cannot.

There is a remarkable overlap between those who cannot and those who who have been stumping for censorship and social control: The Oberlin College 30-million-dollar liability loss; the mob-like assembly that saw House Masters at Yale hounded from their position over seasonal Halloween costumes; the Canadian psychologist being barred from teaching and threatened with the revocation of his license to practice.

The people that are now eschewing support of Hamas are the very people who have insinuated themselves in the cores of our educational and legal systems, content with the brushing aside of explicit constitutional rights in exchange for control over content and interpretation through extra-legal views of laws and regulations. (The content of the can of beans one put in his soup is controlled by the Food and Drug Administration.)

We talk regularly about these people, but they choose not to hear us.

I sense my modest contribution to The Free Press and the objective of Mzes Wiess Mr. Kern, Mr. Hughes and the others writing for this journal will help us all, irrespective of of political viewpoint, will receive well-written, well reasoned, and timely news. The Free Press seems to be punching well above its weight class. You'll have my continued, and grateful thanks.

Expand full comment