I really appreciate the frank and honest discussion, but there were a few comments that seem to assume a conclusion that is not clear to me. For instance, Brett Stevens said that using the term “globalist” is a dog whistle for Jews. I don’t understand why that is the case and no one challenged him on that. Can someone help me understand this better?
I really appreciate the frank and honest discussion, but there were a few comments that seem to assume a conclusion that is not clear to me. For instance, Brett Stevens said that using the term “globalist” is a dog whistle for Jews. I don’t understand why that is the case and no one challenged him on that. Can someone help me understand this better?
I really appreciate the frank and honest discussion, but there were a few comments that seem to assume a conclusion that is not clear to me. For instance, Brett Stevens said that using the term “globalist” is a dog whistle for Jews. I don’t understand why that is the case and no one challenged him on that. Can someone help me understand this better?