While I don’t agree with everything you say, I don’t think you’re entirely wrong. Whether or not Fetterman is actually “Everyman” is irrelevant. It’s how he has portrayed himself and how MSM presents him. Some don’t buy it, many obviously do.
What do we know about Oz? He’s famous, old, and incredibly wealthy. How many younger voters can…
While I don’t agree with everything you say, I don’t think you’re entirely wrong. Whether or not Fetterman is actually “Everyman” is irrelevant. It’s how he has portrayed himself and how MSM presents him. Some don’t buy it, many obviously do.
What do we know about Oz? He’s famous, old, and incredibly wealthy. How many younger voters can relate to that. It reminds me of the videos of Mitt Romney pretending to go grocery shopping in his designer jeans—it looked manufactured.
The Dems are much more effective at selling ideas and making promises, even if the ideas are BS and the promises continue to go unfulfilled.
Sean Parnell was supposed to be the guy until his ex-wife slammed him with legal issues relating to abuse. She litigated those claims in 2017 and they were dismissed. She litigated them again while he was running. He bowed out to demonstrate to his children that they came first. Megyn Kelly recently interviewed him on her podcast and ever since then, I think about what might have been if this hadn't happened. He says he's not finished with politics. I hope not.
Curious was Oz one of the candidates that the Dems donated to because they wanted to run against him and not someone better? That strategy should be illegal in my opinion.
Agree on all points, and they all reflect a serious lack of critical thinking skills in the voting populace. And you don't need to be highly educated to have critical thinking skills, and in many ways being highly educated hinders your critical thinking skills.
While I don’t agree with everything you say, I don’t think you’re entirely wrong. Whether or not Fetterman is actually “Everyman” is irrelevant. It’s how he has portrayed himself and how MSM presents him. Some don’t buy it, many obviously do.
What do we know about Oz? He’s famous, old, and incredibly wealthy. How many younger voters can relate to that. It reminds me of the videos of Mitt Romney pretending to go grocery shopping in his designer jeans—it looked manufactured.
The Dems are much more effective at selling ideas and making promises, even if the ideas are BS and the promises continue to go unfulfilled.
Sean Parnell was supposed to be the guy until his ex-wife slammed him with legal issues relating to abuse. She litigated those claims in 2017 and they were dismissed. She litigated them again while he was running. He bowed out to demonstrate to his children that they came first. Megyn Kelly recently interviewed him on her podcast and ever since then, I think about what might have been if this hadn't happened. He says he's not finished with politics. I hope not.
Curious was Oz one of the candidates that the Dems donated to because they wanted to run against him and not someone better? That strategy should be illegal in my opinion.
Agree on all points, and they all reflect a serious lack of critical thinking skills in the voting populace. And you don't need to be highly educated to have critical thinking skills, and in many ways being highly educated hinders your critical thinking skills.