The role of the New York Times in the Journalism Jumps the Turnstile article in framing public opinion has, I believe, parallels to the AP coverage of the Israel-Hamas war. The vast number of AP articles have bylines of reporters with Arab names who, obviously from their reporting, have access to Hamas sources. In nearly every article, t…
The role of the New York Times in the Journalism Jumps the Turnstile article in framing public opinion has, I believe, parallels to the AP coverage of the Israel-Hamas war. The vast number of AP articles have bylines of reporters with Arab names who, obviously from their reporting, have access to Hamas sources. In nearly every article, they report casualties and events from Hamas sources without question. Yet if they report something from the Israeli side it almost always includes the statement that "this cannot be independently confirmed." Over weeks and weeks of repetition, readers begin to believe that information from Israel is not as reliable as that of Hamas, thus framing public opinion.
The role of the New York Times in the Journalism Jumps the Turnstile article in framing public opinion has, I believe, parallels to the AP coverage of the Israel-Hamas war. The vast number of AP articles have bylines of reporters with Arab names who, obviously from their reporting, have access to Hamas sources. In nearly every article, they report casualties and events from Hamas sources without question. Yet if they report something from the Israeli side it almost always includes the statement that "this cannot be independently confirmed." Over weeks and weeks of repetition, readers begin to believe that information from Israel is not as reliable as that of Hamas, thus framing public opinion.