They aren't suggesting that we abandon reason altogether, just that we question whether or not it should be the basis of every decision we make. You seem to be intent on not understand the point they are trying to make. You have to approach this with an open mind. You seem to have already made up your mind on the subject. So there's no point in trying to explain it.
They aren't suggesting that we abandon reason altogether, just that we question whether or not it should be the basis of every decision we make. You seem to be intent on not understand the point they are trying to make. You have to approach this with an open mind. You seem to have already made up your mind on the subject. So there's no point in trying to explain it.
So please do explain where non-reason is superior to reason in the context of CRT? You want non-reason? Go and become an Islamic fundamentalist. You'll love it. As said before, social discourse MUST be based on reason. Otherwise you are advocating fascism.
They aren't suggesting that we abandon reason altogether, just that we question whether or not it should be the basis of every decision we make. You seem to be intent on not understand the point they are trying to make. You have to approach this with an open mind. You seem to have already made up your mind on the subject. So there's no point in trying to explain it.
So please do explain where non-reason is superior to reason in the context of CRT? You want non-reason? Go and become an Islamic fundamentalist. You'll love it. As said before, social discourse MUST be based on reason. Otherwise you are advocating fascism.