You don’t have to like him, but you do need to report things that are factual, if in fact you choose to use your status as a historian to reach the many people who subscribe to what is considered a very popular blog. That’s my beef with her. She should be intellectually curious, but she should also let the facts speak for themself. She r…
You don’t have to like him, but you do need to report things that are factual, if in fact you choose to use your status as a historian to reach the many people who subscribe to what is considered a very popular blog. That’s my beef with her. She should be intellectually curious, but she should also let the facts speak for themself. She reports her opinions as facts, and that is not good journalism. I found her at the beginning of her blog to be much less biased, but I just can’t stomach her anymore due to her seemingly increased pandering to her subscribers, predominantly well educated upper middle class women (I myself fall into this category) and lack of objectivity. She has some merit, but personally for me she falls short of what I seek in gathering information and assimilating that information for myself.
You don’t have to like him, but you do need to report things that are factual, if in fact you choose to use your status as a historian to reach the many people who subscribe to what is considered a very popular blog. That’s my beef with her. She should be intellectually curious, but she should also let the facts speak for themself. She reports her opinions as facts, and that is not good journalism. I found her at the beginning of her blog to be much less biased, but I just can’t stomach her anymore due to her seemingly increased pandering to her subscribers, predominantly well educated upper middle class women (I myself fall into this category) and lack of objectivity. She has some merit, but personally for me she falls short of what I seek in gathering information and assimilating that information for myself.