"This latter task will be more important under a second Biden presidency than it has been at any time since FDR’s fourth term. Should Biden be re-elected, there is a one in three chance of his vice president taking his job before January 2029. And roughly half the electorate thinks that Harris is not up to the demands of that job."
Ummmm, don't tell anyone, but Biden is not running for re-election.
"This latter task will be more important under a second Biden presidency than it has been at any time since FDR’s fourth term. Should Biden be re-elected, there is a one in three chance of his vice president taking his job before January 2029. And roughly half the electorate thinks that Harris is not up to the demands of that job."
Ummmm, don't tell anyone, but Biden is not running for re-election.
"This latter task will be more important under a second Biden presidency than it has been at any time since FDR’s fourth term. Should Biden be re-elected, there is a one in three chance of his vice president taking his job before January 2029. And roughly half the electorate thinks that Harris is not up to the demands of that job."
Ummmm, don't tell anyone, but Biden is not running for re-election.
I know. The Time article was from Jan 30 this year. But they just published a puff piece how she’s the bees knees now just three days ago.
https://time.com/7009317/reintroduction-of-kamala-harris/
Which raises the age-old question: were they lying to us then? Or are they lying to us now? We all know the answer is YES to both.
Ah, I see. I did not realize you were quoting from the article.
Yes, the gaslighting with Harris is quite a shitshow.