I'm curious why the tiny sample size Reuters focus group reporting post-debate sentiments of independent voters was something you're following but not the Washington Post's much larger focus group. The answer is obvious to me: You're biased, reporting only news unfavorable to Harris.
I'm curious why the tiny sample size Reuters focus group reporting post-debate sentiments of independent voters was something you're following but not the Washington Post's much larger focus group. The answer is obvious to me: You're biased, reporting only news unfavorable to Harris.
What a ridiculous comment. Also, in case you weren't aware, the Washington Post is totally biased in favor of Harris. I do agree with the two people in their poll that said they are in favor of neither candidate at the end of the debate, which was my takeaway. Two compulsive lairs battling it out to see who can lie the most. I'd say it was a draw, though the "moderators" never fact checked anything Harris said, only Trump. I pick neither.
I'm curious why the tiny sample size Reuters focus group reporting post-debate sentiments of independent voters was something you're following but not the Washington Post's much larger focus group. The answer is obvious to me: You're biased, reporting only news unfavorable to Harris.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/elections/interactive/2024/presidential-debate-voter-poll/
What a ridiculous comment. Also, in case you weren't aware, the Washington Post is totally biased in favor of Harris. I do agree with the two people in their poll that said they are in favor of neither candidate at the end of the debate, which was my takeaway. Two compulsive lairs battling it out to see who can lie the most. I'd say it was a draw, though the "moderators" never fact checked anything Harris said, only Trump. I pick neither.
That’s funny