“that some of us are proposing innovative hypotheses that could help explain at least part of the autism surge, relating to how some exposures could disturb the programming of our gametes”
Sadly, Ms. Escher’s has made it clear any innovative hypotheses from her will refuse to include how toxic potions promising protections against future …
“that some of us are proposing innovative hypotheses that could help explain at least part of the autism surge, relating to how some exposures could disturb the programming of our gametes”
Sadly, Ms. Escher’s has made it clear any innovative hypotheses from her will refuse to include how toxic potions promising protections against future pathogens (ie. the new definition of vaccines) injected into healthy babies and children might, “disturb the programming of our gamates”.
“that some of us are proposing innovative hypotheses that could help explain at least part of the autism surge, relating to how some exposures could disturb the programming of our gametes”
Sadly, Ms. Escher’s has made it clear any innovative hypotheses from her will refuse to include how toxic potions promising protections against future pathogens (ie. the new definition of vaccines) injected into healthy babies and children might, “disturb the programming of our gamates”.