If there's a scientific refutation of William Happer's work, I have yet to see it. CO2 isn't a black hole, it is not an infinite heat sink - there should be a saturation point. According to his analysis, we've already achieved it: there is already enough CO2 in the atmosphere to block the pertinent spectrum of ultraviolet radiation fr…
If there's a scientific refutation of William Happer's work, I have yet to see it. CO2 isn't a black hole, it is not an infinite heat sink - there should be a saturation point. According to his analysis, we've already achieved it: there is already enough CO2 in the atmosphere to block the pertinent spectrum of ultraviolet radiation from the sun. In other words, global warming was a 20th century phenomena that once existed but no longer does. If some other atmospheric physicist has found a flaw in Mr. Happer's analysis, please provide the link.
Steven Koonin's book Unsettled... is a readable explanation of issues in climate science written by a distinguished physicist and for Undersecretary for Science in the Obama administration.
Striking among his explanations are examples how the body of the IPCC reports directly contradict major points in the Executive Summary, which is the only part journalists read.
Koonin is a real physicist (a real climate scientist field) who has built and understands models and so his book is a wealth of knowledge.
Opponents will claim it’s been refuted but he went online and decimated the refutations, which shamefully much media refused to carry (there we are again with media and social media supporting a narrative instead of reporting the news).
We need a thorough house cleaning.
If you want to understand why climate alarmism stories seem to appear around the world at the same time, look up the propaganda outfit Covering Climate Now and see how many “news” organizations belong and Propagate the alarmism formulated by the nonclimate scientists there writing them.
If there's a scientific refutation of William Happer's work, I have yet to see it. CO2 isn't a black hole, it is not an infinite heat sink - there should be a saturation point. According to his analysis, we've already achieved it: there is already enough CO2 in the atmosphere to block the pertinent spectrum of ultraviolet radiation from the sun. In other words, global warming was a 20th century phenomena that once existed but no longer does. If some other atmospheric physicist has found a flaw in Mr. Happer's analysis, please provide the link.
Happer is correct, yes.
So actual scientists are still looking to explain the warming from 1980-2000 ( there are many hypothesis’) and why it’s been flat for a while
And why there is no troposphere hotspot predicted by theory
And why the models are kludge
Steven Koonin's book Unsettled... is a readable explanation of issues in climate science written by a distinguished physicist and for Undersecretary for Science in the Obama administration.
Striking among his explanations are examples how the body of the IPCC reports directly contradict major points in the Executive Summary, which is the only part journalists read.
Koonin is a real physicist (a real climate scientist field) who has built and understands models and so his book is a wealth of knowledge.
Opponents will claim it’s been refuted but he went online and decimated the refutations, which shamefully much media refused to carry (there we are again with media and social media supporting a narrative instead of reporting the news).
We need a thorough house cleaning.
If you want to understand why climate alarmism stories seem to appear around the world at the same time, look up the propaganda outfit Covering Climate Now and see how many “news” organizations belong and Propagate the alarmism formulated by the nonclimate scientists there writing them.