I have a problem when anyone, Bari included, starts a discussion by appealing to authority...classical logical fallacy. I DO NOT CARE about the cv of those being asked for their opinion, it is not relevant. The arguments presented by the court are what is in question, not the pedigree of those commenting. Affirmative action is clearly, a…
I have a problem when anyone, Bari included, starts a discussion by appealing to authority...classical logical fallacy. I DO NOT CARE about the cv of those being asked for their opinion, it is not relevant. The arguments presented by the court are what is in question, not the pedigree of those commenting. Affirmative action is clearly, and obviously wrong on its face. Not doing business with ANYONE is clearly the right of the business, do this at your peril if you exclude certain people. The root of the problem is the assumption that the government can and should decide what you can do that does not harm anyone else. In this regard the left is clearly wrong and applies randomly and subjectively the notion that angelic governments can and should govern behavior, wrong on all fronts.
I have a problem when anyone, Bari included, starts a discussion by appealing to authority...classical logical fallacy. I DO NOT CARE about the cv of those being asked for their opinion, it is not relevant. The arguments presented by the court are what is in question, not the pedigree of those commenting. Affirmative action is clearly, and obviously wrong on its face. Not doing business with ANYONE is clearly the right of the business, do this at your peril if you exclude certain people. The root of the problem is the assumption that the government can and should decide what you can do that does not harm anyone else. In this regard the left is clearly wrong and applies randomly and subjectively the notion that angelic governments can and should govern behavior, wrong on all fronts.