I seriously have no idea what this advocate is saying. The interviewer asks some basic questions and we get back a circular argument. And when a question is too difficult, the person does not answer becasue right wing people will do something? This is evicdence of weak arguments.
If one wants to state that your genetics and biology do not…
I seriously have no idea what this advocate is saying. The interviewer asks some basic questions and we get back a circular argument. And when a question is too difficult, the person does not answer becasue right wing people will do something? This is evicdence of weak arguments.
If one wants to state that your genetics and biology do not define your gender (whatever that means) then start there. We can all agree that your biology does not define WHO you are. But why fight against what is obvious and scientifically accurate. Genes define your 'sex'. Who you are and how you express your 'gender' within that genetic range is who you are. And if you are a feminine genetic male- fine. So what.
I seriously have no idea what this advocate is saying. The interviewer asks some basic questions and we get back a circular argument. And when a question is too difficult, the person does not answer becasue right wing people will do something? This is evicdence of weak arguments.
If one wants to state that your genetics and biology do not define your gender (whatever that means) then start there. We can all agree that your biology does not define WHO you are. But why fight against what is obvious and scientifically accurate. Genes define your 'sex'. Who you are and how you express your 'gender' within that genetic range is who you are. And if you are a feminine genetic male- fine. So what.
Amen!