Sandberg's documentary was necessary but not sufficient to fight the explicit jew hate that is becoming acceptable even desirable in the West.
Cheryl is willingly to talk and make a documentary about innocent Jewish women being raped, as a method Hamas Terrorists use to fight wars, but she is unwillingly to do use her money and social sta…
Sandberg's documentary was necessary but not sufficient to fight the explicit jew hate that is becoming acceptable even desirable in the West.
Cheryl is willingly to talk and make a documentary about innocent Jewish women being raped, as a method Hamas Terrorists use to fight wars, but she is unwillingly to do use her money and social status to demand real change.
Cheryl claims to be an institutional reformist but she gives herself way to much credit.
One doesn't reform any institution if one keeps funding them, without tying funds to actual reform. The institutions, whether Harvard of the Democratic party only care about money and power. If one continues to fund those institutions there is NO incentive for them to change.
Harvard is a bastion of Jew hate. The Democrats have sitting members of Congress who explicitly hate Jews and chant along with "from the river to the sea". Cheryl's funding of those institutions incentivizes that behavior.
Cheryl made an important documentary. But if she really wants to stop the Jew hate she is going to have to stop being the "nice Jewish girl" and start being the tough Jewish B***h.
She is going to have to exercise power in a way that incentivizes real change. I am not sure she is up for being that woman.
Sandberg's documentary was necessary but not sufficient to fight the explicit jew hate that is becoming acceptable even desirable in the West.
Cheryl is willingly to talk and make a documentary about innocent Jewish women being raped, as a method Hamas Terrorists use to fight wars, but she is unwillingly to do use her money and social status to demand real change.
Cheryl claims to be an institutional reformist but she gives herself way to much credit.
One doesn't reform any institution if one keeps funding them, without tying funds to actual reform. The institutions, whether Harvard of the Democratic party only care about money and power. If one continues to fund those institutions there is NO incentive for them to change.
Harvard is a bastion of Jew hate. The Democrats have sitting members of Congress who explicitly hate Jews and chant along with "from the river to the sea". Cheryl's funding of those institutions incentivizes that behavior.
Cheryl made an important documentary. But if she really wants to stop the Jew hate she is going to have to stop being the "nice Jewish girl" and start being the tough Jewish B***h.
She is going to have to exercise power in a way that incentivizes real change. I am not sure she is up for being that woman.