FOR FREE PEOPLE

FOR FREE PEOPLE

Our Next Live Debate: Should the U.S. Still Police the World?

Bret Stephens vs. Matt Taibbi October 9 in New York City. Plus: Watch this week’s debate on the economy now!

By The Free Press

September 13, 2024

Since winning the Second World War, the United States has been the dominant world superpower. And we’ve been ready to use that power to defend our national interests, to defend the values of liberal democracy, or both. 

But there has always been a tension in this country between isolationism and interventionism between those who think we should maintain an aggressive stance in world affairs and those who want to focus on our own problems here at home. 

The post–9/11 wars in Iraq and Afghanistan have led many of us to question the efficacy and wisdom of U.S. military intervention. As hot wars rage in Ukraine and Gaza, and as U.S. adversaries like China and Iran threaten to further destabilize the world order, more Americans than ever are asking themselves: What is our role on the world stage? And what should it be?

Does the United States still possess the will to protect our allies and defend our values? Are we still capable of military interventions that are strategically sound and beneficial to global stability? Should we fight to maintain our sole superpower status, or submit to a multipolar world that many insist is already upon us? 

On October 9, The Free Press will host the final installment of our America Debates series at Symphony Space in New York City. We are proud to partner with the country’s leading defender of free speech rights, the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE), to bring you this debate. And we are thrilled to welcome four brilliant people to hash out the question: Should the U.S. Still Police the World?

Arguing that yes, the U.S. must maintain its role as world policeman, is Bret Stephens, opinion columnist for The New York Times and editor-in-chief of Sapir, a new journal focused on Jewish issues. He is a former editor-in-chief of The Jerusalem Post and foreign affairs columnist of The Wall Street Journal, for which he was awarded the 2013 Pulitzer Prize for commentary. Stephens is the author of America in Retreat: The New Isolationism and the Coming Global Disorder

Joining Bret is Jamie Kirchick, contributing opinion writer for The New York Times, writer at large for Air Mail, and contributing writer for Tablet. He is the author of The End of Europe: Dictators, Demagogues, and the Coming Dark Age, and Secret City: The Hidden History of Gay Washington, which was an instant New York Times bestseller and Notable Book of the Year.

Arguing that the U.S. needs to rein in its foreign interventions is journalist Matt Taibbi, founder of Racket News. Taibbi is the author of ten books, including four New York Times bestsellers. He was previously a contributing editor for Rolling Stone and winner of the 2008 National Magazine Award for columns and commentary. He began his career in the former Soviet Union, where he wrote in English and in Russian for more than a decade.

Joining Matt is Lee Fang, an independent investigative journalist, primarily writing on Substack at leefang.com. From 2015–2023, he was a reporter for The Intercept and has previously written for The Nation and VICE, among other outlets. Fang’s work uncovering illegal foreign influence in the American campaign finance system led to one of the largest Federal Election Commission fines in American history.

We hope you’ll join us. 

Paid subscribers get access to the 24-hour presale window for tickets HERE, using the code at the end of this email. 

If you haven’t attended one of our debates, we urge you to check this one out. They are fun, fiery, thought-provoking—and a chance to be in a room with other Free Pressers. For a taste of what’s to come in New York, paid subscribers can now view the filmed version of the latest Free Press debate from earlier this week in Washington, D.C., below. 

This post is for paying subscribers only

Subscribe

Already have an account? Log in

our Comments

Use common sense here: disagree, debate, but don't be a .

the fp logo
comment bg

Welcome to The FP Community!

Our comments are an editorial product for our readers to have smart, thoughtful conversations and debates — the sort we need more of in America today. The sort of debate we love.   

We have standards in our comments section just as we do in our journalism. If you’re being a jerk, we might delete that one. And if you’re being a jerk for a long time, we might remove you from the comments section. 

Common Sense was our original name, so please use some when posting. Here are some guidelines:

  • We have a simple rule for all Free Press staff: act online the way you act in real life. We think that’s a good rule for everyone.
  • We drop an occasional F-bomb ourselves, but try to keep your profanities in check. We’re proud to have Free Press readers of every age, and we want to model good behavior for them. (Hello to Intern Julia!)
  • Speaking of obscenities, don’t hurl them at each other. Harassment, threats, and derogatory comments that derail productive conversation are a hard no.
  • Criticizing and wrestling with what you read here is great. Our rule of thumb is that smart people debate ideas, dumb people debate identity. So keep it classy. 
  • Don’t spam, solicit, or advertise here. Submit your recommendations to tips@thefp.com if you really think our audience needs to hear about it.
Close Guidelines

Latest