The techno optimism piece is very unbalanced. The homage to Nietzsche toward the end seems to undergird the general take. The precautionary principle is categorically bad? The take, if nothing else, is incompatible with a non-secular worldview. It is possible to celebrate human ingenuity without making man out to be functional gods. It’s folly.
The techno optimism piece is very unbalanced. The homage to Nietzsche toward the end seems to undergird the general take. The precautionary principle is categorically bad? The take, if nothing else, is incompatible with a non-secular worldview. It is possible to celebrate human ingenuity without making man out to be functional gods. It’s folly.
The techno optimism piece is very unbalanced. The homage to Nietzsche toward the end seems to undergird the general take. The precautionary principle is categorically bad? The take, if nothing else, is incompatible with a non-secular worldview. It is possible to celebrate human ingenuity without making man out to be functional gods. It’s folly.