Yeah, I was pretty much giving them the benefit of the doubt; stupid is more accurate. So, I'm having this discussion about the NYT a while back with a coastal Boomer Phd ex-college professor who is digging in hard on the premise that NYT is politically balanced, leaning neither left or right, the proof of which he avers is that David Br…
Yeah, I was pretty much giving them the benefit of the doubt; stupid is more accurate. So, I'm having this discussion about the NYT a while back with a coastal Boomer Phd ex-college professor who is digging in hard on the premise that NYT is politically balanced, leaning neither left or right, the proof of which he avers is that David Brooks writes for its editorial page. David Brooks as in the NYT straw-man conservative that no other conservative on the planet ever cites or refers to. David Brooks is to the NYT what a butt thong is to a pole dancer.
Yeah, I was pretty much giving them the benefit of the doubt; stupid is more accurate. So, I'm having this discussion about the NYT a while back with a coastal Boomer Phd ex-college professor who is digging in hard on the premise that NYT is politically balanced, leaning neither left or right, the proof of which he avers is that David Brooks writes for its editorial page. David Brooks as in the NYT straw-man conservative that no other conservative on the planet ever cites or refers to. David Brooks is to the NYT what a butt thong is to a pole dancer.