"When the legacy media encounters an inconvenient fact—Biden’s age, say, or Hunter’s laptop, or the lab leak, or the complexity of puberty blockers, or the riots of the summer of 2020—it likes to take some time to process the problem.
Reporters need to discuss the issue over dinner, wring their hands about what to do, get yelled at for po…
"When the legacy media encounters an inconvenient fact—Biden’s age, say, or Hunter’s laptop, or the lab leak, or the complexity of puberty blockers, or the riots of the summer of 2020—it likes to take some time to process the problem.
Reporters need to discuss the issue over dinner, wring their hands about what to do, get yelled at for possible thought crimes by a righteously angry intern, mull some more, get yelled at again by another intern. To have more drinks, more meetings."
Makes me wonder what the interns were thinking. If they were thinking like me, they might have thrown up. You journalists are supposed to want to find the truth. You're supposed to be above the fray. You're supposed to be the conduit for the truth to flow to the public.
Reading those words also made me wonder WTF is being taught in the universities' schools of journalism. Because if one of the professors described the "profession" as above, I would head out to the lawn to start the protest. Seriously, how different are those words than what was spoken by the journalists in the Soviet Union? I mean what do the reporters mentioned above do to resolve their dilemma? Call the DNC? How is that any different than calling the Communist Party of the Soviet Union?
Jeez, go read about Woodward and Bernstein and Watergate. Contrast their tenacity, curiosity, focus, and drive to get the truth out to the public ASAP with the description of the "legacy media" given to us.
"When the legacy media encounters an inconvenient fact—Biden’s age, say, or Hunter’s laptop, or the lab leak, or the complexity of puberty blockers, or the riots of the summer of 2020—it likes to take some time to process the problem.
Reporters need to discuss the issue over dinner, wring their hands about what to do, get yelled at for possible thought crimes by a righteously angry intern, mull some more, get yelled at again by another intern. To have more drinks, more meetings."
Makes me wonder what the interns were thinking. If they were thinking like me, they might have thrown up. You journalists are supposed to want to find the truth. You're supposed to be above the fray. You're supposed to be the conduit for the truth to flow to the public.
Reading those words also made me wonder WTF is being taught in the universities' schools of journalism. Because if one of the professors described the "profession" as above, I would head out to the lawn to start the protest. Seriously, how different are those words than what was spoken by the journalists in the Soviet Union? I mean what do the reporters mentioned above do to resolve their dilemma? Call the DNC? How is that any different than calling the Communist Party of the Soviet Union?
Jeez, go read about Woodward and Bernstein and Watergate. Contrast their tenacity, curiosity, focus, and drive to get the truth out to the public ASAP with the description of the "legacy media" given to us.