Who would want to save the Democrat party in its present form? It isn't on our side- our side being America. The party has morphed into its fringe radicals. They're globalists. That's what the broken border was about. Come on in, what's ours is yours. It's everybody's. A piece in The Hill chastised Americans who want to restore our manuf…
Who would want to save the Democrat party in its present form? It isn't on our side- our side being America. The party has morphed into its fringe radicals. They're globalists. That's what the broken border was about. Come on in, what's ours is yours. It's everybody's. A piece in The Hill chastised Americans who want to restore our manufacturing base for being selfish, for not deferring to the third world.
Who cares if fanatics shave their heads or withhold sex? They're acting out for attention. Don't give it to them.
When someone tells you who they are, believe them. Democrats and their professoriate op-ed writers see the Constitution as a "problem." Free speech, individual rights, private property. Our government works with shadowy firms to censor differing opinions as disinformation. That's the antithesis of what this country once stood for. They're doing this incidentally to "save democracy," the classic totalitarian inversion.
The US army has something called the "DEI Directorate," which sounds like something in Springtime for Hitler. In their stealth campaign to overtake and socially engineer the suburbs, "special managers" -- how soviet- are empowered to force low-cost housing in mainly upscale neighborhoods (less expensive areas, which actually offer lower cost housing, are exempt) targeted by NGOs whose leader told the press that upscale suburbs need to be more "inclusive." Why does an NGO run the show? In the U.S., we never had unelected "special managers" to tell us where we could build housing, or who should live there. These suburbs are already inclusive; they include the people from all races and ethnicities who can afford them, who earned them. At the same time, Democrats push legislation that prohibits the disclosure of a prison record for renters. Other plans are re-zoning single family housing in the suburbs to multiple -housing lots, and houses built in backyards.
In Seattle, housing advocates, despite substantive increases in apartment complexes and four-story buildings all over the place, objected that some single family areas remained intact, in other words left alone. These people are targeting the very concept of the fundamental right to own your own house on your own lot. Private property.
Any Democratic Republic needs opposition parties to keep the others honest. Something broke in the United States and one party turned on the country itself- it's culture, it's from of government, it's history and it's economy. No country can survive that. In this election I believe more than anything else the voters the whites the Latinos the black men voted for nothing less than it survival. Unless that party reconstitutes I don't see a future that would benefit the United States. Maybe the surviving sane members will finally speak out and form their own party. Judging from their defense of the loss, which manages to put the party in a good light (we didn't do the proper media); they're all racist and misogynists; they were online instead of listening to us, the geniuses, instead of: we went insane) I don't see this happening. They're so clueless they think they can out of spit and wishes, create a Joe Rogan on their side. At the very least the party's remaining normal members, or member, branching off would deny the cover the party has provided to anti- Western, America- hating, racist radicals. Force the radicals to stand on their own for election, to properly identify themselves as either communists, globalists, or socialists.
Who would want to save the Democrat party in its present form? It isn't on our side- our side being America. The party has morphed into its fringe radicals. They're globalists. That's what the broken border was about. Come on in, what's ours is yours. It's everybody's. A piece in The Hill chastised Americans who want to restore our manufacturing base for being selfish, for not deferring to the third world.
Who cares if fanatics shave their heads or withhold sex? They're acting out for attention. Don't give it to them.
When someone tells you who they are, believe them. Democrats and their professoriate op-ed writers see the Constitution as a "problem." Free speech, individual rights, private property. Our government works with shadowy firms to censor differing opinions as disinformation. That's the antithesis of what this country once stood for. They're doing this incidentally to "save democracy," the classic totalitarian inversion.
The US army has something called the "DEI Directorate," which sounds like something in Springtime for Hitler. In their stealth campaign to overtake and socially engineer the suburbs, "special managers" -- how soviet- are empowered to force low-cost housing in mainly upscale neighborhoods (less expensive areas, which actually offer lower cost housing, are exempt) targeted by NGOs whose leader told the press that upscale suburbs need to be more "inclusive." Why does an NGO run the show? In the U.S., we never had unelected "special managers" to tell us where we could build housing, or who should live there. These suburbs are already inclusive; they include the people from all races and ethnicities who can afford them, who earned them. At the same time, Democrats push legislation that prohibits the disclosure of a prison record for renters. Other plans are re-zoning single family housing in the suburbs to multiple -housing lots, and houses built in backyards.
In Seattle, housing advocates, despite substantive increases in apartment complexes and four-story buildings all over the place, objected that some single family areas remained intact, in other words left alone. These people are targeting the very concept of the fundamental right to own your own house on your own lot. Private property.
Any Democratic Republic needs opposition parties to keep the others honest. Something broke in the United States and one party turned on the country itself- it's culture, it's from of government, it's history and it's economy. No country can survive that. In this election I believe more than anything else the voters the whites the Latinos the black men voted for nothing less than it survival. Unless that party reconstitutes I don't see a future that would benefit the United States. Maybe the surviving sane members will finally speak out and form their own party. Judging from their defense of the loss, which manages to put the party in a good light (we didn't do the proper media); they're all racist and misogynists; they were online instead of listening to us, the geniuses, instead of: we went insane) I don't see this happening. They're so clueless they think they can out of spit and wishes, create a Joe Rogan on their side. At the very least the party's remaining normal members, or member, branching off would deny the cover the party has provided to anti- Western, America- hating, racist radicals. Force the radicals to stand on their own for election, to properly identify themselves as either communists, globalists, or socialists.