Didn’t mean to sound like I was picking on you about “daughter of rape.” During many years with the pro-life movement, I’ve read a lot of personal accounts by people who were conceived by rape, and it’s not a term I’ve ever seen them use.
I see what you’re saying with the California penal codes. I think the confusion comes from “a part of…
Didn’t mean to sound like I was picking on you about “daughter of rape.” During many years with the pro-life movement, I’ve read a lot of personal accounts by people who were conceived by rape, and it’s not a term I’ve ever seen them use.
I see what you’re saying with the California penal codes. I think the confusion comes from “a part of a hand touching genitalia or through underwear, without penetration” - I was thinking of stuff like a man touching a woman’s labia majora, not right outside her vagina.
"... however slight is sufficient to complete the crime."
Technically, a wedgie with pants on would be covered and whoever could be put away for 15 years. Technically, the horsing around among girls at gymnastics gyms would be covered for sure.
Didn’t mean to sound like I was picking on you about “daughter of rape.” During many years with the pro-life movement, I’ve read a lot of personal accounts by people who were conceived by rape, and it’s not a term I’ve ever seen them use.
I see what you’re saying with the California penal codes. I think the confusion comes from “a part of a hand touching genitalia or through underwear, without penetration” - I was thinking of stuff like a man touching a woman’s labia majora, not right outside her vagina.
"... however slight is sufficient to complete the crime."
Technically, a wedgie with pants on would be covered and whoever could be put away for 15 years. Technically, the horsing around among girls at gymnastics gyms would be covered for sure.