Chain of command. There is no link between the reporting of the crime, and the collection, maintenance, and presentation of the evidence. They need to account for who has had access to the evidence, and whether it has been corrupted. This is makes a mockery of our justice system, and potentially can lead to innocent men being tried because a "victim" decided they did not like them anymore.
Chain of command. There is no link between the reporting of the crime, and the collection, maintenance, and presentation of the evidence. They need to account for who has had access to the evidence, and whether it has been corrupted. This is makes a mockery of our justice system, and potentially can lead to innocent men being tried because a "victim" decided they did not like them anymore.
This is vital in any criminal trial. The prosecution has to prove, and the court has to ensure, that any evidence is free from tampering before it can be admitted. Defense attorneys will pounce on this. And it has nothing to do with this specific crime. The Rules of Evidence apply to all crimes.
Chain of command. There is no link between the reporting of the crime, and the collection, maintenance, and presentation of the evidence. They need to account for who has had access to the evidence, and whether it has been corrupted. This is makes a mockery of our justice system, and potentially can lead to innocent men being tried because a "victim" decided they did not like them anymore.
I think you mean "chain of custody."
Thank you, Amy!
I think you meant "chain of custody."
This is vital in any criminal trial. The prosecution has to prove, and the court has to ensure, that any evidence is free from tampering before it can be admitted. Defense attorneys will pounce on this. And it has nothing to do with this specific crime. The Rules of Evidence apply to all crimes.