People seem to be forgetting that this so-called "vaccine" (which does not actually provide immunity - does not prevent infection or transmission) is EXPERIMENTAL. The long-term effects are still not known, though many of the short-term effects ARE known (but are vastly under-reported). Take a look at the assortment of adverse effects h…
People seem to be forgetting that this so-called "vaccine" (which does not actually provide immunity - does not prevent infection or transmission) is EXPERIMENTAL. The long-term effects are still not known, though many of the short-term effects ARE known (but are vastly under-reported). Take a look at the assortment of adverse effects here:
By the way, "VAERS is the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System put in place in 1990. It is a voluntary reporting system that has been estimated to account for only 1% ( see the Lazarus Report) of vaccine injuries." Here's the link to that report: https://openvaers.com/images/r18hs017045-lazarus-final-report-20116.pdf.
Why do we not have accurate data with the real numbers?
In the aftermath of the atrocities of the Holocaust, the Nuremberg Code was drawn up to establish ethical guidelines for medical experimentation. Here's more info:
This Covid "vaccine" program is a massive experiment in which each recipient is essentially a lab rat. Note the first point in the Nuremberg Code - that of Informed Consent:
"1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.
This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.
The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity."
Here's my point: how many of those who took the Covid shots were fully informed of potential cardio-vascular risks, neurological risks, potential for Antibody-dependent Enhancement (ADE), or any other of the myriad side effects? Some of us thought to do more research than others.
So before you dismiss the "unvaccinated" as knuckle-dragging, ignorant, and selfish, or “some fool (who) decided to be afraid of vaccines”, or people who “deserve scorn and mockery”(from posts below), consider these possibilities:
1. The Covid shots will NEVER lead society to herd immunity, and are possibly preventing it.
2. For those who have had Covid and recovered, the shots may be completely unnecessary, if not potentially dangerous.
3. For many people (especially people like myself with pre-existing heart conditions), the shot could cause known serious adverse and irreversible effects. Yet, many believe they have the right to mandate me to play Russian Roulette with my life, which is completely unjustified from a scientific standpoint, much less an ethical standpoint (back to informed consent).
4. I cannot pass Covid on to you if I do not have Covid. If I’ve already had Covid and recovered, then those chances are slim to none.
5. You are free to take the shots if you decide that is the best option for you. I SHOULD be free to decide that I will not submit to an experimental intervention that could cause me more harm than benefit (including negligible benefit to those around me since mass vaccination is not preventing the spread of the virus).
People seem to be forgetting that this so-called "vaccine" (which does not actually provide immunity - does not prevent infection or transmission) is EXPERIMENTAL. The long-term effects are still not known, though many of the short-term effects ARE known (but are vastly under-reported). Take a look at the assortment of adverse effects here:
https://openvaers.com/covid-data.
By the way, "VAERS is the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System put in place in 1990. It is a voluntary reporting system that has been estimated to account for only 1% ( see the Lazarus Report) of vaccine injuries." Here's the link to that report: https://openvaers.com/images/r18hs017045-lazarus-final-report-20116.pdf.
Why do we not have accurate data with the real numbers?
In the aftermath of the atrocities of the Holocaust, the Nuremberg Code was drawn up to establish ethical guidelines for medical experimentation. Here's more info:
https://www.ushmm.org/information/exhibitions/online-exhibitions/special-focus/doctors-trial/nuremberg-code
This Covid "vaccine" program is a massive experiment in which each recipient is essentially a lab rat. Note the first point in the Nuremberg Code - that of Informed Consent:
"1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.
This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.
The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity."
Here's my point: how many of those who took the Covid shots were fully informed of potential cardio-vascular risks, neurological risks, potential for Antibody-dependent Enhancement (ADE), or any other of the myriad side effects? Some of us thought to do more research than others.
So before you dismiss the "unvaccinated" as knuckle-dragging, ignorant, and selfish, or “some fool (who) decided to be afraid of vaccines”, or people who “deserve scorn and mockery”(from posts below), consider these possibilities:
1. The Covid shots will NEVER lead society to herd immunity, and are possibly preventing it.
2. For those who have had Covid and recovered, the shots may be completely unnecessary, if not potentially dangerous.
3. For many people (especially people like myself with pre-existing heart conditions), the shot could cause known serious adverse and irreversible effects. Yet, many believe they have the right to mandate me to play Russian Roulette with my life, which is completely unjustified from a scientific standpoint, much less an ethical standpoint (back to informed consent).
4. I cannot pass Covid on to you if I do not have Covid. If I’ve already had Covid and recovered, then those chances are slim to none.
5. You are free to take the shots if you decide that is the best option for you. I SHOULD be free to decide that I will not submit to an experimental intervention that could cause me more harm than benefit (including negligible benefit to those around me since mass vaccination is not preventing the spread of the virus).
Happy Thanksgiving!!!