Why is there a debate about removing a non-citizen from our country who is “fighting for the total eradication of Western civilization," while leveraging our freedoms and resources to do so? Arguing "free speech" is absurd. It's like saying, "I believe so strongly in non-violence, I will not fire the gun in my hand at the murderer about to kill my child."
Why is there a debate about removing a non-citizen from our country who is “fighting for the total eradication of Western civilization," while leveraging our freedoms and resources to do so? Arguing "free speech" is absurd. It's like saying, "I believe so strongly in non-violence, I will not fire the gun in my hand at the murderer about to kill my child."
I don’t think thats the debate. The debate is about the fact that the Trump Administration wanted to “disappear” him like the “Venezuelans.” He is entitled to a hearing and a trial. If a judge or jury finds him guilty, toss his ass.
Why is there a debate about removing a non-citizen from our country who is “fighting for the total eradication of Western civilization," while leveraging our freedoms and resources to do so? Arguing "free speech" is absurd. It's like saying, "I believe so strongly in non-violence, I will not fire the gun in my hand at the murderer about to kill my child."
I don’t think thats the debate. The debate is about the fact that the Trump Administration wanted to “disappear” him like the “Venezuelans.” He is entitled to a hearing and a trial. If a judge or jury finds him guilty, toss his ass.