To hear an ally (Ukraine) called a “vassal” who is supposed to pay tribute to a petulant child masking himself as president of the U.S. is disgusting. I’ve enjoyed the FP for its ability to discuss issues that the rest of the media has ignored or been so partisan on that there is little truth in their reporting (the crisis of rising anti…
To hear an ally (Ukraine) called a “vassal” who is supposed to pay tribute to a petulant child masking himself as president of the U.S. is disgusting. I’ve enjoyed the FP for its ability to discuss issues that the rest of the media has ignored or been so partisan on that there is little truth in their reporting (the crisis of rising antisemitism for one thing). But, if you’re going to do a deep dive into foreign policy, how about showing the same care by bringing on foreign policy experts rather than three people with no understanding of it? I hope this episode was a blip rather than a pattern. I came for moderate, common sense discussions, not drink-the-koolaid maga lunacy—there are plenty of outlets who already do that.
To hear an ally (Ukraine) called a “vassal” who is supposed to pay tribute to a petulant child masking himself as president of the U.S. is disgusting. I’ve enjoyed the FP for its ability to discuss issues that the rest of the media has ignored or been so partisan on that there is little truth in their reporting (the crisis of rising antisemitism for one thing). But, if you’re going to do a deep dive into foreign policy, how about showing the same care by bringing on foreign policy experts rather than three people with no understanding of it? I hope this episode was a blip rather than a pattern. I came for moderate, common sense discussions, not drink-the-koolaid maga lunacy—there are plenty of outlets who already do that.