This is a terribly simplistic analysis of several unique and complex situations. It makes no distinction between those "whistleblowers" who broke the law and violated the oath and terms of their employment and those, such as the IRS employees who spilled the beans on the Hunter Biden investigation, who were protected by statute when they…
This is a terribly simplistic analysis of several unique and complex situations. It makes no distinction between those "whistleblowers" who broke the law and violated the oath and terms of their employment and those, such as the IRS employees who spilled the beans on the Hunter Biden investigation, who were protected by statute when they publicized their revelations. The author has done a disservice to both her credibility and the First Amendment with her facile approach to this question.
This is a terribly simplistic analysis of several unique and complex situations. It makes no distinction between those "whistleblowers" who broke the law and violated the oath and terms of their employment and those, such as the IRS employees who spilled the beans on the Hunter Biden investigation, who were protected by statute when they publicized their revelations. The author has done a disservice to both her credibility and the First Amendment with her facile approach to this question.