Except there is nothing controversial about it. Even Israel says as much.
If you want to have a serious conversation, then please do so. But don't be disingenuous. Simply disregarding the facts on the ground because it doesn't fit your simple us-vs-them narrative isn't serious.
Except there is nothing controversial about it. Even Israel says as much.
If you want to have a serious conversation, then please do so. But don't be disingenuous. Simply disregarding the facts on the ground because it doesn't fit your simple us-vs-them narrative isn't serious.
Put another way: it would at least be reasonable to debate whether Israel has the right to kill 10's of thousands of civilians through heavy bombardment (which all sides agree they have done) and close off the borders to significant aide (which again, all sides agree they have done) ... and then debate the reasons thereof. But simply saying "no they didn't do what they even said they did" isn't serious.
Except there is nothing controversial about it. Even Israel says as much.
If you want to have a serious conversation, then please do so. But don't be disingenuous. Simply disregarding the facts on the ground because it doesn't fit your simple us-vs-them narrative isn't serious.
Put another way: it would at least be reasonable to debate whether Israel has the right to kill 10's of thousands of civilians through heavy bombardment (which all sides agree they have done) and close off the borders to significant aide (which again, all sides agree they have done) ... and then debate the reasons thereof. But simply saying "no they didn't do what they even said they did" isn't serious.
What Part of "Give Me A Source" don't you understand?
So not serious. Ok - cool! You have a good one.