His point at the time was *if he didn't win*, the electric cars would flood the market and there would be a bloodbath. My point that the comments in the article are a false equivalency stands. Reporters just can't resist a chance to make comparisons that aren't there.
His point at the time was *if he didn't win*, the electric cars would flood the market and there would be a bloodbath. My point that the comments in the article are a false equivalency stands. Reporters just can't resist a chance to make comparisons that aren't there.
His point at the time was *if he didn't win*, the electric cars would flood the market and there would be a bloodbath. My point that the comments in the article are a false equivalency stands. Reporters just can't resist a chance to make comparisons that aren't there.