Trump's "bloodbath" was in regards to what would possibly happen to the auto industry in America if Chinese electric cars were allowed to flood the American market. It was not about riots if he lost the election. Surely you know that,....
Trump's "bloodbath" was in regards to what would possibly happen to the auto industry in America if Chinese electric cars were allowed to flood the American market. It was not about riots if he lost the election. Surely you know that,....
His point at the time was *if he didn't win*, the electric cars would flood the market and there would be a bloodbath. My point that the comments in the article are a false equivalency stands. Reporters just can't resist a chance to make comparisons that aren't there.
Trump's "bloodbath" was in regards to what would possibly happen to the auto industry in America if Chinese electric cars were allowed to flood the American market. It was not about riots if he lost the election. Surely you know that,....
His point at the time was *if he didn't win*, the electric cars would flood the market and there would be a bloodbath. My point that the comments in the article are a false equivalency stands. Reporters just can't resist a chance to make comparisons that aren't there.