Thanks for the debate. WK’s style is smug and insufferable; GC’s approach seemed to be very regimented to his talking points. One debate strategy I suppose is say what you want to say and ignore the other person’s suppositions and entreaties. My thinking on this still is that I hope this doesn’t become another Patriot Act/FISA abuse situation, but am afraid it will….and soon.
Thanks for the debate. WK’s style is smug and insufferable; GC’s approach seemed to be very regimented to his talking points. One debate strategy I suppose is say what you want to say and ignore the other person’s suppositions and entreaties. My thinking on this still is that I hope this doesn’t become another Patriot Act/FISA abuse situation, but am afraid it will….and soon.
Thanks for the debate. WK’s style is smug and insufferable; GC’s approach seemed to be very regimented to his talking points. One debate strategy I suppose is say what you want to say and ignore the other person’s suppositions and entreaties. My thinking on this still is that I hope this doesn’t become another Patriot Act/FISA abuse situation, but am afraid it will….and soon.