Sandberg tries to split hairs between polarized narratives people cling to and frank antisemitism. Ironically, the only reason she is splitting these hairs is because it doesn’t fit her own narrative that she is clinging to, which is that it can’t be that the left is teeming with antisemitism and this antisemitism is the direct result of…
Sandberg tries to split hairs between polarized narratives people cling to and frank antisemitism. Ironically, the only reason she is splitting these hairs is because it doesn’t fit her own narrative that she is clinging to, which is that it can’t be that the left is teeming with antisemitism and this antisemitism is the direct result of its worldview on many other issues. Allowing her narrative to be challenged would leave her entire identity stripped.
Then she suggests if we just keep showing people the evidence, it will change things. She follows this with the usual elitist view that the problem is lack of education followed by some both sidesing.
At the very end, she demonstrates to the max how attached she is to her narrative when she says repeatedly “I *can’t* believe that. I *can’t* believe that.” Sounds like attachment to a narrative to me.
Sandberg is as clueless as they come and basically a useful idiot clinging to her exploded worldview.
Absolutely. Agree with you entirely. It reminds me of a situation with filmmaker Gazer who made an excellent film about the environment that made Holocaust possible. Yet his Oscar speech proved to the astonished audiences that his own moral inversion is the problem.
Sandberg tries to split hairs between polarized narratives people cling to and frank antisemitism. Ironically, the only reason she is splitting these hairs is because it doesn’t fit her own narrative that she is clinging to, which is that it can’t be that the left is teeming with antisemitism and this antisemitism is the direct result of its worldview on many other issues. Allowing her narrative to be challenged would leave her entire identity stripped.
Then she suggests if we just keep showing people the evidence, it will change things. She follows this with the usual elitist view that the problem is lack of education followed by some both sidesing.
At the very end, she demonstrates to the max how attached she is to her narrative when she says repeatedly “I *can’t* believe that. I *can’t* believe that.” Sounds like attachment to a narrative to me.
Sandberg is as clueless as they come and basically a useful idiot clinging to her exploded worldview.
Absolutely. Agree with you entirely. It reminds me of a situation with filmmaker Gazer who made an excellent film about the environment that made Holocaust possible. Yet his Oscar speech proved to the astonished audiences that his own moral inversion is the problem.