⭠ Return to thread

I know I'm supposed to be impressed by this, but I'm not. You see, I know what the team "Queer" means in Leftist circles. Most on the Right literally have no idea what that term means. It's about an intention to destroy ALL SOCIAL NORMS in a particular prog-marxist way, so called 'deconstruction' to allow the Utopia to emerge they promise is coming.

So while I appreciate that she's repulsed by the overt abuse of children, she still adheres to the ideology that gives rise to it. An ideology that is pernicious and destructive to all I hold dear. Let me be blunt. I'm not morally impressed with someone who went along with this and only reluctantly goes public once it's obvious this is evil and destructive. My response is "Yay, you have the morals of an average human. But why don't you stop pursuing 'queering' our society while you are at it, hun? Cuz that's immoral AF too...".

Expand full comment

Ahh, ad hominem attacks, the highest form of intellectual argument.

Expand full comment