Easy: From now on real researchers should publish an Approved version of their work, just as Dr. Brown has done, with all readers understanding that once the Approved version has achieved it's political/social goals -- publicity, funding, tenure ... whatever -- that the Unapproved version will follow. Thus the Approved version should be …
Easy: From now on real researchers should publish an Approved version of their work, just as Dr. Brown has done, with all readers understanding that once the Approved version has achieved it's political/social goals -- publicity, funding, tenure ... whatever -- that the Unapproved version will follow. Thus the Approved version should be taken as a teaser, nothing more. Real scientists would of course wait for the real version before commenting. Mind ... some traffic would be needed over the first version, I suppose.
Easy: From now on real researchers should publish an Approved version of their work, just as Dr. Brown has done, with all readers understanding that once the Approved version has achieved it's political/social goals -- publicity, funding, tenure ... whatever -- that the Unapproved version will follow. Thus the Approved version should be taken as a teaser, nothing more. Real scientists would of course wait for the real version before commenting. Mind ... some traffic would be needed over the first version, I suppose.