yuk. reading this made me slightly ill. the saddest part of the article to me was the picture of Loehmanns closed I remember when it opened. I took a "sick day" from work to be in line to shop til i dropped as I was a dedicated Loehmanns shopper in Boston where a friend and I shopped for 5 roommates. We were between university and gra…
yuk. reading this made me slightly ill. the saddest part of the article to me was the picture of Loehmanns closed I remember when it opened. I took a "sick day" from work to be in line to shop til i dropped as I was a dedicated Loehmanns shopper in Boston where a friend and I shopped for 5 roommates. We were between university and grad school when we lived a year of fun!! I drove in from Galveston for the opening and as I drove a truck pulled up beside me.. when I looked over the driver raised up and jacked off. smiling all the way. Hey it was the "city" guess I was lucky he di not yell out his pronouns but now I live about an hour away and have not been to SF in about 10 years and I loved it and miss it....I even avoid the airport. I remember driving in to go to the opera and then to Stars to hang at the bar with the "rich and famous" like Willie Brown of "Kamala" fame. it was the place to be..homeless yes. they were there. . but as a part it the city. not the whole city.. but enough of that.. I am a libertarian.. I believe drugs should be legal. .. all drugs.. what I do not believe is that when a person chooses the drug life that the rest who do not should support them in their choice by giving them whatever it takes to keep them from breaking onto my car.. or stealing my stuff. Nellie says:"Residents had hoped Boudin would reform the criminal-justice system and treat low-level offenders more humanely. Instead, critics argued that his policies victimized victims, allowed criminals to go free to reoffend, and did nothing to help the city’s most vulnerable" I think she is mistaken about who is the city's "most vulnerable". It certainly is NOT the addicts of SF
yuk. reading this made me slightly ill. the saddest part of the article to me was the picture of Loehmanns closed I remember when it opened. I took a "sick day" from work to be in line to shop til i dropped as I was a dedicated Loehmanns shopper in Boston where a friend and I shopped for 5 roommates. We were between university and grad school when we lived a year of fun!! I drove in from Galveston for the opening and as I drove a truck pulled up beside me.. when I looked over the driver raised up and jacked off. smiling all the way. Hey it was the "city" guess I was lucky he di not yell out his pronouns but now I live about an hour away and have not been to SF in about 10 years and I loved it and miss it....I even avoid the airport. I remember driving in to go to the opera and then to Stars to hang at the bar with the "rich and famous" like Willie Brown of "Kamala" fame. it was the place to be..homeless yes. they were there. . but as a part it the city. not the whole city.. but enough of that.. I am a libertarian.. I believe drugs should be legal. .. all drugs.. what I do not believe is that when a person chooses the drug life that the rest who do not should support them in their choice by giving them whatever it takes to keep them from breaking onto my car.. or stealing my stuff. Nellie says:"Residents had hoped Boudin would reform the criminal-justice system and treat low-level offenders more humanely. Instead, critics argued that his policies victimized victims, allowed criminals to go free to reoffend, and did nothing to help the city’s most vulnerable" I think she is mistaken about who is the city's "most vulnerable". It certainly is NOT the addicts of SF