Agreed! If a teacher has the capacity to develop their own materials, that's an indicator they are in the right field. Teaching is not a robotic activity, and we want our students encountering adults who are passionate enough about their fields to continue understanding it and figuring out new ways to deliver the instruction with wonder …
Agreed! If a teacher has the capacity to develop their own materials, that's an indicator they are in the right field. Teaching is not a robotic activity, and we want our students encountering adults who are passionate enough about their fields to continue understanding it and figuring out new ways to deliver the instruction with wonder and insight. Teaching is not curriculum delivery. That 96% stat tells us absoutely nothing. Quantity of data says nothing about quality of data. Be more nuanced please. Interview some teachers who have developed their own materials for noble purposes. Figure out what the actual organic connection is between teachers, teachers colleges, teachers unions, curriculum developers and ideological indoctrination. This would be worthy of any journalist's time.
Agreed! If a teacher has the capacity to develop their own materials, that's an indicator they are in the right field. Teaching is not a robotic activity, and we want our students encountering adults who are passionate enough about their fields to continue understanding it and figuring out new ways to deliver the instruction with wonder and insight. Teaching is not curriculum delivery. That 96% stat tells us absoutely nothing. Quantity of data says nothing about quality of data. Be more nuanced please. Interview some teachers who have developed their own materials for noble purposes. Figure out what the actual organic connection is between teachers, teachers colleges, teachers unions, curriculum developers and ideological indoctrination. This would be worthy of any journalist's time.