It is difficult to listen to the drag queen rationale, and blatant ridicule of those the hosts consider homophobe. The idea of taking New York’s $200,000 and spending it in Kansas to “drag deprived ” people is not even humorous, and worse if it was serious. When I saw the intro of “two of our favorite lesbians”, I thought…and in what wa…
It is difficult to listen to the drag queen rationale, and blatant ridicule of those the hosts consider homophobe. The idea of taking New York’s $200,000 and spending it in Kansas to “drag deprived ” people is not even humorous, and worse if it was serious. When I saw the intro of “two of our favorite lesbians”, I thought…and in what way does knowing that enhance the story? Do other sites introduce their hosts as “two of our favorite straight/cisgender people”? No, or should they.
It is difficult to listen to the drag queen rationale, and blatant ridicule of those the hosts consider homophobe. The idea of taking New York’s $200,000 and spending it in Kansas to “drag deprived ” people is not even humorous, and worse if it was serious. When I saw the intro of “two of our favorite lesbians”, I thought…and in what way does knowing that enhance the story? Do other sites introduce their hosts as “two of our favorite straight/cisgender people”? No, or should they.
Agree. well said.